Skip Navigation



Forestry Advance Access published online on August 22, 2007

Forestry, doi:10.1093/forestry/cpm023
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
80/4/385    most recent
cpm023v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ammer, C.
Right arrow Articles by Mosandl, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Institute of Chartered Foresters, 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Which grow better under the canopy of Norway spruce—planted or sown seedlings of European beech?

Christian Ammer1,* and Reinhard Mosandl2

1 Department for Silviculture and Forest Ecology, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Büsgenweg 1, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
2 Chair of Silviculture, Technische Universität München, Am Hochanger 13, D-85354 Freising, Germany

* Corresponding author. E-mail: christian.ammer{at}forst.uni-goettingen.de


   Abstract

Direct seeding and planting of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) are two common techniques for the conversion of pure Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) stands into mixed stands. This study tested whether the growth of sown beech seedlings differs from that of planted seedlings of two stock types. Therefore at two experimental sites repeated measurements were made of height, stem and first order branch diameter on sown and planted seedlings over a period of nine years. The results showed that the growth responses of planted and sown seedlings to the environmental conditions below the canopy of overstorey Norway spruce were rather similar. No differences between planted and sown seedlings were found in their diameter and their estimated aboveground dry weight. For all three batches the ratio between the estimated branch dry weight and the estimated main stem dry weight (branch-shoot-ratio (BSR)) was increased with age. Due to intraspecific competition BSR was lowest for the sown seedlings irrespective of their age. Differences in growth dynamics between planted and sown seedlings were found. For example, differences in the height or the estimated aboveground woody dry weight between sown and planted seedlings at a given age were not constant. Height, diameter and estimated dry mass of the seedlings in relation to age could be modelled precisely by a second-order polynomial function in the hitherto studied period.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.