Skip Navigation



Forestry Advance Access published online on November 22, 2005
Forestry, doi:10.1093/forestry/cpi058
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
79/1/43    most recent
cpi058v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by South, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Vanderschaaf, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Crown copyright, 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Article

Determining productivity gains from herbaceous vegetation management with ‘age-shift’ calculations

David B. South 1 *, James H. Miller 2, Mark O. Kimberley 3, and Curtis L. Vanderschaaf 4

1 School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, AL 36849, USA
2 USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 520 DeVall Drive, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
3 New Zealand Forest Research Institute Ltd, Private Bag 3020 Rotorua, New Zealand
4 College of Natural Resources, Virginia Tech University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
David B. South, E-mail: southdb{at}auburn.edu


  Abstract

Gains in stand volume that result from competition control and fertilization are sometimes reported as ‘percentage gains’. Because percentage gains arithmetically decline over time as stand volume increases, plantation managers have difficulty in using percentage gains to project growth and revenues. The ‘age-shift’ method quantifies the year advancements in stand growth due to silvicultural treatments and, for herbaceous vegetation management, it has been proposed that this metric is less likely to change after the juvenile growth phase. To test the sensitivity of the ‘age-shift’ method to time and hardwood competition, we used 20-year volume data from 11 loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) studies that had early complete herbaceous and woody competition control. Volume growth gains were expressed in terms of percentages and ‘age-shifts’. On all sites with no woody competition, percentage gains declined from age 8 years to age 20 years. In contrast, age-shift estimates on these plots either remained constant or increased over time. However, in four cases where woody basal areas were greater than 4 m2 ha-1 at age 15 years, age-shift gains due to herbaceous control decreased and eventually resulted in volume losses. When evaluating the response to early herbaceous competition control, age-shift calculations have promise as a useful predictive tool on sites with low levels of hardwood competition. Five methods for calculating age-shift are presented.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.