Skip Navigation


Forestry Advance Access originally published online on March 6, 2009
Forestry 2009 82(3):241-254; doi:10.1093/forestry/cpp003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
82/3/241    most recent
cpp003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Powers, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Nagel, L. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Institute of Chartered Foresters, 2009. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Pennsylvania sedge cover, forest management and Deer density influence tree regeneration dynamics in a northern hardwood forest

Matthew D. Powers and Linda M. Nagel*

School of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, 1400 Townsend Drive, Houghton, MI 49931, USA

* Corresponding author. E-mail: lmnagel{at}mtu.edu


  Abstract

Pennsylvania sedge (Carex pensylvanica Lam.) is a native species that can form dense mats in the understory of northern hardwood forests. Resource managers suspect Pennsylvania sedge mats could limit tree regeneration, leading to changes in forest structure and composition. A number of other factors could alter the understory plant community, so any attempt to understand the effects of sedge populations should also account for these other processes. This study considered relationships between Pennsylvania sedge cover, management history, deer density and tree regeneration in a northern hardwood forest. All the factors considered had significant effects on saplings, but few significant relationships with tree seedlings. Stands managed using even-aged silvicultural systems had lower sapling densities for several species and species groups and lower species diversity than unharvested second-growth stands. High deer densities were associated with low levels of both sapling density and sapling species diversity. Pennsylvania sedge cover was negatively correlated with the density of secondary species and sapling species diversity in stands with moderate deer densities. Results from this study suggest a number of factors are influencing northern hardwood tree regeneration in these forests, and further research involving multifactor approaches is needed to clarify the mechanisms driving forest vegetation dynamics.

Received 4 September 2008.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.