Skip Navigation


Forestry Advance Access originally published online on May 21, 2007
Forestry 2007 80(3):337-349; doi:10.1093/forestry/cpm010
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
80/3/337    most recent
cpm010v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, F.
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Institute of Chartered Foresters, 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Comparison of point pattern analysis methods for classifying the spatial distributions of spruce-fir stands in the north-east USA

Fasheng Li1 and Lianjun Zhang2,*

1 Pfizer, Inc. Eastern Point Road, Groton, CT 06340, USA
2 Faculty of Forest and Natural Resources Management, State University of New York, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, One Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA

* Corresponding author. E-mail: lizhang{at}esf.edu


  Abstract

The spatial distributions of tree locations in spruce-fir forest stands in the north-east USA were explored by various methods of spatial point pattern analysis. The results indicated that the 13 nearest neighbour statistics were not reliable because of the assumption violations for independent distance measures and large sample size requirements. Three other methods (i.e. refined nearest neighbour functions, Ripley's K-function and pair correlation function) seemed to capture the different aspects of the spatial patterns of these spruce-fir stands. The edge effect correction was very important to obtain unbiased results for the spatial point pattern analysis. The toroidal edge correction proved to be simple and satisfactory in this study compared with other edge correction methods. The results indicated that 24 plots (48 per cent) were classified as complete spatial random (CSR) point pattern, 17 (34 per cent) regular point pattern and 9 (18 per cent) clustered point pattern among the 50 plots. It was evident that the clustered plots were younger in age with much higher density and much smaller tree sizes than the CSR or regular plots. This classification scheme can be used as the basis for other spatial studies such as spatial point process modelling.

Received 16 October 2006.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ForestryHome page
L. Zhang, Z. Ma, and L. Guo
Spatially assessing model errors of four regression techniques for three types of forest stands
Forestry, April 24, 2008; (2008) cpn014v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.