Skip Navigation


Forestry Advance Access originally published online on December 23, 2006
Forestry 2007 80(1):83-88; doi:10.1093/forestry/cpl047
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
80/1/83    most recent
cpl047v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pastur, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mundo, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Institute of Chartered Foresters, 2006. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Diameter growth: can live trees decrease?

Guillermo Martínez Pastur1,*, María Vanessa Lencinas1, Juan Manuel Cellini2 and Ignacio Mundo2,3

1 Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas (CONICET), cc 92 (9410), Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina
2 Fac. Cs. Agrs. y Ftales (UNLP) La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
3 Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales (CONICET) Mendoza, Mendoza, Argentina

* Corresponding author. E-mail: cadicforestal{at}cadic.gov.ar


  Abstract

Growth refers to an increase in dimensions with time and is implicit in the expected continual increase in tree dimensions. Tree diameters, however, could decrease during the growing season due to water depletion. Annual negative growth measurements are usually attributed to human error and not to other physiological or physical processes. Although seasonal and diurnal fluctuations of diameter have been well documented, perennial decrement of diameter has not been the focus of physiological research. The aim of this work was to analyse the potential causes of decrease in annual diameter growth related to tree mortality due to self-thinning in Nothofagus pumilio forests and to quantify the variations in water depletion of the tree trunks. Some trees did present negative annual diameter increments associated with a water content decrease in the trunks (77 per cent in live trees compared with 56 per cent in recently dead individuals), which produced a contraction (more than 8 per cent of the initial diameter) in the wood and the bark. Trees could survive during 2–5 growth seasons with continual decreases in their diameters (14 per cent, standard error 5 per cent of the trees in the studied stand) until the water content reached a limit where mortality resulted. Therefore, the occurrence of data showing a diameter decrease in successive forest inventories may be due to physiological and physical processes in the natural dynamics of the stand, and not exclusively be explained away as the results of human measurement errors.

Received 29 November 2006.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.