Skip Navigation


Forestry Advance Access originally published online on October 12, 2005
Forestry 2005 78(5):485-499; doi:10.1093/forestry/cpi049
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
78/5/485    most recent
cpi049v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Papageorgiou, K.
Right arrow Articles by Christodoulou, Ath.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Institute of Chartered Foresters, 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Linking quality of life and forest values in rural areas: an exploratory study of stakeholder perspectives in the rural community of Konitsa, Greece

K. Papageorgiou1,*, K. Kassioumis1, V. Blioumis2 and Ath. Christodoulou2

1 NAGREF-Agricultural Research Station of Ioannina, E. Antistasis 1, Katsikas, 452 21, Ioannina, Greece
2 Department of Forestry and Natural Environment, Institute of Forest Economics, Aristotelian University of Thessaloniki, 541 24, Thessaloniki, Greece

* Corresponding author. E-mail: kostpap{at}freemail.gr

This study attempts to identify and associate the perceived forest and rural quality of life values that people hold in rural areas in order to form a basis for improving forest management decision-making. The perceived forest and rural values of two distinct local stakeholder goups are summarized from a survey undertaken in the rural community of Konitsa. The empirical evidence suggests that the respondents associate quality of rural life mainly with the attractiveness of nature and landscape as well as a sense of community life. In particular, multi-purpose forestry remains not only an issue within the scientific community and forest policymakers but also is espoused widely by the local community. The analysis identified certain value preference patterns between contemporary rural values and major forest values; it acknowledged forests as an integrative part of people's interaction with the living conditions in Konitsa. The nature of these preference patterns shows that there may be opportunities for enhancing forest contributions to rural development which evolve from a purely productive-based practice into a style of forestry to improve environmental public goods, strengthen community stability, create amenity forests, and enhance the quality of life in the broader sense. Local forest decision-makers should consider not only the socio-economic environment or the dynamic of the area but also the perceived standard of living in the area. The study observed the dissonance between current forest practices and local expectations. It implies that an integrated and ecosystem-based forest strategy should be adopted to evaluate more accurately the contributions of forestry to local demands and rural well-being, be open and democratic and lay claim to involvement at the local level.

Received 17 December 2004.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.