Skip Navigation

Forestry 2004 77(4):287-295; doi:10.1093/forestry/77.4.287
© 2004 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmidtling, R.C.
Right arrow Articles by Hipkins, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The after-effects of reproductive environment in shortleaf pine

R.C. SchmidtlingA1,* and V. HipkinsA2

A1 USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station, Southern Institute of Forest Genetics, 23332 Hwy 67, Saucier, MS 39574, USA A2 USDA Forest Service, NFGEL Laboratory, Placerville, CA, USA

Thirteen identical controlled crosses were made among 22 shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.) clones growing in two contrasting reproductive environments: a seed orchard in central Arkansas, USA (34.6°N) and a clone bank in south Mississippi (30.5°N). The resulting seedlings from both reproductive environments were planted at both locations where the seed was produced. After 4 years in the field (5 years from seed), trees from seed produced in the two environments differed significantly in height. The reproductive environment x family interaction was also significant, however, indicating that the effect depended upon the genetic background of the parent trees. By age 9 years, differences were no longer statistically significant. Allozymes were assayed in seed produced in the two reproductive environments. Chi-squared tests of heterogeneity of segregation ratios for polymorphic loci showed significant differences between the two environments for many cross/loci combinations. Although the pattern of differences was not obviously linked to differences in growth, gametophytic selection is suggested as a possible explanation for the after-effects.


* Corresponding author. E-mail: rschmidtling{at}fs.fed.us


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.