© 2002 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Approaches to quantifying forest structures
1 School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, Wales
For some time, structure indices – quantifying spatial stand structure – have been integrated into forest research and are used to provide a measure of biodiversity. In addition, correlation functions – developed initially for problems outside forestry – enable analysis and characterization of forest stand structures, generating more accessible information. This paper outlines a classification of structural indices measuring alpha diversity and examines typical representatives of the classification groups such as the Shannon index, the aggregation index of Clark and Evans, the contagion index, the coefficient of segregation of Pielou, the mingling index, the diameter differentiation index, the pair correlation and the mark correlation function. These can be used to measure differences between forests in time and space, to generate forest structures, to analyse the differences between observed and expected structures and to characterize modifications of forest structure resulting from selective harvesting. These algorithms are the keys for assessing complex forest structures, which can be the result of continuous cover forestry methods. Continuous cover forests with selective harvesting are being promoted in the new forest policies of Britain. Case studies have shown that from given spatial forest structures one can possibly conclude the suitability for habitats, a hypothesis which has yet to be proved by further appropriate analysis. The equations for the quantification of stand structure presented in this paper have the advantage that they are easier to survey during forest inventory than the more direct measures of ecological variety.
Received 14 February 2001.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. Macdonald, B. Gardiner, and W. Mason The effects of transformation of even-aged stands to continuous cover forestry on conifer log quality and wood properties in the UK Forestry, September 23, 2009; (2009) cpp023v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Sterba Diversity indices based on angle count sampling and their interrelationships when used in forest inventories Forestry, December 1, 2008; 81(5): 587 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. L. Mason, T. Connolly, A. Pommerening, and C. Edwards Spatial structure of semi-natural and plantation stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in northern Scotland Forestry, December 1, 2007; 80(5): 567 - 586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. P. Miller Alleles In Space (AIS): Computer Software for the Joint Analysis of Interindividual Spatial and Genetic Information J. Hered., November 1, 2005; 96(6): 722 - 724. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Stamatellos and G. Panourgias Simulating spatial distributions of forest trees by using data from fixed area plots Forestry, July 1, 2005; 78(3): 305 - 312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|