Skip Navigation

Forestry 2002 75(2):107-138; doi:10.1093/forestry/75.2.107
© 2002 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macdonald, E.
Right arrow Articles by Hubert, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

A review of the effects of silviculture on timber quality of Sitka spruce

Elspeth Macdonald1 and Jason Hubert1

1 Forest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9SY, Scotland

This review focuses on timber quality with a particular emphasis on Sitka spruce and sawlog production, although issues pertaining to pulp and panel quality are also dealt with. The review is split into three broad areas. The first covers the factors controlling wood quality that operate within the timber itself and also at the whole-tree scale. These include knots, grain angle, wood density, tracheid length, microfibril angle, juvenile wood and compression wood, tree/log size, growth rate, stem straightness and stem taper. The second section reviews the link between silviculture, site and genetics on these controlling factors and the consequences for wood quality for different end-uses. The silvicultural factors reviewed are rotation length, initial spacing, respacing before canopy closure, thinning after canopy closure, nursing mixtures, pruning, cultivation, weed suppression and fertilizer use. Site factors include site quality, wind, slope, and snow and ice. There is a brief section on the role of genetic improvement on timber quality. Finally, the review provides conclusions and recommends that stands should be identified as being suitable for sawlogs or fibre products and then managed consistently throughout the rotation with a strong focus on the final wood product. For Sitka spruce, the objective of maximizing volume yield appears to be compromising batten performance and buyers should consider premiums for stands where quality has been provided rather than quantity. Long-term forest plans and certification could play an increasing role in providing the assurance that good consistent silvicultural practice had been undertaken throughout the rotation, hence creating the possibility of offering clear premiums for high grade timber.

Received 22 June 2001.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ForestryHome page
D. Scott, D. Welch, and D.A. Elston
Long-term effects of leader browsing by deer on the growth of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis)
Forestry, October 1, 2009; 82(4): 387 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ForestryHome page
E. Macdonald, B. Gardiner, and W. Mason
The effects of transformation of even-aged stands to continuous cover forestry on conifer log quality and wood properties in the UK
Forestry, September 23, 2009; (2009) cpp023v2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ForestryHome page
D. Auty and A. Achim
The relationship between standing tree acoustic assessment and timber quality in Scots pine and the practical implications for assessing timber quality from naturally regenerated stands
Forestry, October 1, 2008; 81(4): 475 - 487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ForestryHome page
D. Welch and D. Scott
An estimate of timber degrade in Sitka spruce due to bark stripping by deer in a Scottish plantation
Forestry, October 1, 2008; 81(4): 489 - 497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.