Forestry Advance Access originally published online on November 4, 2008
Forestry 2009 82(1):105-115; doi:10.1093/forestry/cpn049
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Biomass carbon sinks in Japanese forests: 1966–2012
1 Harvard Forest, Harvard University, 324 North Main Street, Petersham, MA 01366, USA
2 Graduate School of Applied Informatics, University of Hyogo, Hyogo, Japan
3 Faculty of Agriculture, Shinshu University, Ina, Japan
* Corresponding author. E-mail: nsasaki{at}fas.harvard.edu
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The role of forests in absorbing atmospheric carbon has been recognized under the Kyoto Protocol, which allows signatory countries to use forests as a mitigation option. Although several studies have estimated carbon stock changes in Japanese forests, most only estimate changes up to 1995 or ignore carbon stock changes in natural forests. This study is the first attempt to estimate carbon stock changes in Japanese forests from 1966 to 2012, to coincide with the final year of the Kyoto Protocol's first commitment period. Forest area and growing stock data were analysed. Then, two models for predicting the change in forest area and growing stock were developed. Results showed that most natural forest loss resulted from conversion to plantation forest. The total above-ground and below-ground carbon stock in Japanese forests has been estimated to have increased from 1114.8 TgC in 1966 to 2076.0 TgC in 2012, representing an increase of 20.9 TgC year-1 over the same period. During the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol (2008–2012), annual carbon sinks were estimated at 20.1 TgC, of which
76.9 per cent were sequestered in plantation forests. Of the 20.1 TgC year-1, eligible carbon sinks are estimated at 10.2 TgC or
78.7 per cent of the maximum or capped amount as allowed under the Marrakesh Accord. Although further effort is needed so that the capped amount of 13 TgC year-1 could be achieved, this study suggests that carbon sinks through forest management could be used to offset industrial carbon emissions. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Depending on management regimes, forests can play a role in either sequestering atmospheric carbon or releasing carbon into the atmosphere. While forests in most temperate regions are net carbon sinks, tropical forests account for about one-third of global carbon emissions (IPCC, 2001
3.9 per cent out of the 6 per cent reduction commitment as agreed in 1997, FM is playing a vital role in meeting reduction commitment in Japan. In recent years, several studies on carbon stock changes have been conducted (Fukuda et al., 2003
9.2 and 4.4 TgC year–1 between 1990 and 1995) in Sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) and Hinoki (Chamaecyparis obtusa Endl.) plantation forests, respectively. Only one study has focused on potential carbon sinks in Japanese plantation forests during the first commitment period (Hiroshima and Nakajima, 2006
63 to 68 per cent of the capped amount under the Marrakesh Accord. However, no studies incorporating changes in land area and carbon stocks in all forest types have been performed. By analysing the changes in forest area and carbon stocks, the aim of this paper is to estimate the biomass carbon sinks in Japanese forests under the current management trends between 1966 and 2012 with special emphasis on the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol between 2008 and 2012. It is the first attempt to analyse potential carbon stock changes and sinks in both natural and plantation forests during this period. The report is organized as follows: firstly, past change in areas of natural and plantation forests is analysed and based on this, predictions are made up to 2012. Secondly, carbon stock changes in both forest types are analysed as above. Thirdly, eligible carbon sinks in managed forests are estimated and the sensitivity of the results to the assumptions is considered.
| Materials and methodology |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study only covers the above-ground carbon in stems, branches and foliage and below-ground carbon in roots. Carbon fluxes in harvested wood products (HWPs) are not eligible carbon sinks for the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol between 2008 and 2012 and are therefore not included in this study. Since soil organic carbon (SOC) is sensitive to temperature (Knorr et al., 2005
Sources of data and analysis
Data on the changes in areas of and growing stock in plantation and natural forests for 1966, 1971, and 1976 were obtained from the Japan FAO Association (1997)
. Data for 1981, 1986, 1990, 1995, 1999 and 2002 were obtained from forestry statistical survey books published by the Japan Forestry Foundation (Japan Forestry Foundation, 1992
) and the Forestry Agency (Forestry Agency, 2005
). The year 2002 is the latest for which forest survey data are available for Japan collected every 5-year period. In these surveys, forest land use is classified as natural and plantation forests, treeless land (land recently cleared) or bamboo forests. The total area of bamboo forest is small and is therefore not considered. Treeless land (muritsu boku chi to) is integrated into the natural forest classification because it represents recently felled areas that will be converted to plantation forests in few years (Japan Forestry Foundation, 1992
). In terms of area, coniferous species account for 98 per cent of all species in plantation forests, while broadleaved species account for 84.6 per cent of the species found in natural forests.
Weighted average stand volume per hectare was calculated for each forest class and year. Growing stock data, usually expressed in terms of cubic metre (m3), were converted to carbon units (MgC = 106 gC) using equation of Brown (1997)
, as follows:
|
| (1) |
where the variables are defined as follows: CSi, above-ground carbon stock of forest i (MgC ha–1); CD, carbon density (0.5 MgC Mg wood); VDi, growing stock of forest i (m3 ha–1); WDi, weighted wood density of forest i (Mg m–3), WD is 0.509 and 0.342 for natural and plantation forests, respectively (see to Table 1); BEFi, weighted average of biomass expansion factor of forest i (BEF = 1.872 for natural forest, BEF = 1.724 for plantation forest, see Table 1) and i, natural forest or plantation forest.
|
According to the Wood Industry Handbook (Forestry Experimental Report, 1982), wood density in Japanese tree species is estimated at 0.32 Mg m–3 for Sugi (C. japonica), 0.34 Mg m–3 for Hinoki (C. obtusa), 0.44 Mg m–3 for Karamatsu (Larix leptolepis), 0.43 Mg m–3 for Matsu (Pinus spp.), 0.35 Mg m–3 for Todomatsu (Abies sachalinensis), 0.37 Mg m–3 for trees classified as other and 0.54 Mg m–3 for broadleaved trees (0.45 Mg m–3 for broadleaved deciduous trees and 0.61 Mg m-3 for broadleaved evergreen trees). Therefore, WD's weighted average for coniferous and broadleaved trees are 0.338 and 0.540 Mg m–3, respectively (see Table 1).
Land use model
The study used a land use model modified from the study of Kim Phat et al. (2004)
. The model estimates change in the area of natural and plantation forests in Japan:
|
| (2) |
|
| (3) |
where the variables are defined as follows: NF(t), area of natural forest (million ha); PF(t), area of plantation forest (million ha); ka, conversion rate of natural forest to plantation forest, per unit time; kb, conversion rate of natural forest to other uses, per unit time and t, time step (year).
Trends in forest land use change in Japan can be broadly classified into two periods, 1966–1984 with high rates of conversion of natural forest to plantation and 1984–2002 with lower conversion rates (Figure 1). To simplify the analysis, the time series were divided into these two periods and separate submodels were then fitted to the data of forest areas for each period by simple linear regression. Equating and solving the equations for the two submodels obtained the coordinate of the intersection between the submodels. The slope parameter of the regression models gave the parameters (ka + kb) and ka in equations (2)
and (3), respectively. Land use changes after 2002, the last year for which data are available, were predicted by using the submodel for 1984–2002 as a based model.
|
Carbon stock change per hectare
Per hectare (ha–1) carbon stock change in natural and plantation forests can be estimated by the Richards growth model (Richards, 1959
) as follows:
|
| (4) |
where the variables are defined as follows: ai, bi, ci, di, parameters for each forest type obtained by fitting equation (4) to a data set of per-hectare carbon stocks for Japanese forests over the period 1966–2002; CSi(t), average carbon stock in forest i at time t (MgC ha–1); i, natural forest or plantation forest and r, the proportion of above-ground carbon to root carbon. Proportion of root carbon to above-ground carbon range was estimated at 13.4–30.2 per cent in subtropical broadleaf forest in Taiwan (Lin et al., 2006
). Fearnside (1997)
estimated below-ground carbon at 33.6 per cent of above-ground carbon. For this study, 30 per cent is assumed.
Average carbon stock per hectare for each forest type was calculated by taking the total growing stock of each forest (natural or plantation forest) and dividing by the respective area of each forest in the relevant year. The resulting time series of carbon stock per hectare was used to derive the parameters of equation (4) with the aid of the CurveFit Expert 1.3 software package, a comprehensive curve fitting system for Windows developed by Hyams (for more information, see Hyams, 2007
).
Carbon stock changes in all forests
Total carbon stock changes in Japanese forests can be estimated by
![]() | (5) |
![]() |
where the variables are defined as follows: Ci(tn), carbon stock in forest i in year n (MgC year–1); and Li(tn), change in area of forest i in year n compared with previous year, derived by equations (1) and (2) (million ha).
Equation (5) was applied for each year from 1966 to 2012, with extrapolated forest land use data (see above) for the period after 2002 for which no land use data are available.
| Results and discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Area of forest land
Based on the land use submodels, the area of natural forest in Japan decreased from 17.1 million ha in 1966 to 15.0 million ha in 1984, representing a change of –0.72 per cent or a loss of
0.12 million ha year–1 (Figure 1). Over the same period, the plantation forest area increased by 0.6 per cent or
0.10 million ha year–1. For the second period from 1984 to 2012, the loss of natural forest decreased to
0.17 per cent or 25 294.7 ha annually. Plantation forest area increased by
0.08 per cent, or
11 250.0 ha year–1, during the second period between 1984 and 2012 (Figure 1). Overall, Japan lost
60 431.5 ha of natural forest, but gained
46 586.5 ha of plantation forest between 1966 and 2012, giving a net loss in forest area of 13 845.0 ha year–1 (Figure 1).
Carbon stock change per hectare
The carbon stock model, equation (4), suggested that the carbon stock (above-ground and root carbon) in natural forests increased from 48.7 MgC ha–1 in 1966 to 76.0 MgC ha–1 in 2012, representing an annual increase of
0.6 MgC ha–1. During the first commitment period between 2008 and 2012, annual carbon sequestration is estimated at 0.5 MgC ha–1. In contrast to the moderate increase of carbon sequestered in natural forests, carbon stock in plantation forests increased about
5-fold between 1966 and 2012, from 24.3 MgC ha–1 in 1966 to 101.6 MgC ha–1 in 2012. This represents an average increase of 1.7 MgC ha–1 year-1 over the whole period and
1.2 MgC between 2008 and 2012 (Figure 2). On average, carbon stocks of all Japanese forests increased from 36.5 MgC ha–1 in 1966 to 88.8 MgC ha–1, a rate of
1.1 MgC ha–1 year–1.
|
Our results of periodic annual increment (PAI) between 1990 and 1995 is 2.2 MgC ha–1 year–1, which is slightly greater than that estimated by Fukuda et al. (2003)
1.6 MgC according to equation (1) at 15 years of age to 20.7 m3 ha–1 year–1 (7.0 MgC year–1) at 50 years, Hosoda, 1998
4.9 MgC ha–1 year–1 at 25–93 years of age in Kochi Prefecture. MAI of Hinoki (C. obtusa) at 60 years of age was estimated at
5.4 m3 ha–1 year–1 (1.8 MgC ha–1 year–1), ranging from 1.1 m3 ha–1 year–1 (0.4 MgC ha–1 year–1) to 5.4 m3 ha–1 year–1 (1.8 MgC ha–1 year–1) at Okushima Mountain in Siga Prefecture (Hosoda, 1997
|
Table 2 suggested that the result of our study is smaller than that found at experimental sites across Japan. This is due to the fact that intensive thinning was conducted in those sites in order to accelerate the growth, while our study focused on the average growth of thinned and unthinned forests in the whole Japan. Table 2 also suggested that thinning could improve the growth of forest plantations and therefore, if Japanese government undertakes thinning in all 80 per cent of the immature forests that require thinning, more carbon sinks are likely to occur in forests.
Total carbon stock change in Japanese forests
According to the model (Equation (5)), total carbon stocks in plantation and natural forests, respectively, increased from 144.0 and 970.8 TgC in 1966 to 883.1 and 1192.9 TgC in 2012 (Figure 3). Averaged over the period 1966–2012, carbon sequestration in Japanese forests is estimated at
16.1 and 4.8 TgC year–1 for plantation and natural forests, respectively. For the first commitment period (2008–2012), the sequestration is estimated at 15.3 and 4.8 TgC year–1 for plantation and natural forests, respectively (Figure 3). This gives a total of 20.1 TgC year–1, higher than the allowable carbon sinks as capped under the Marrakesh Agreement. Discussion on eligible carbon sinks under the Kyoto agreement is given in the next section.
|
Discussion on eligible carbon sinks
According to article 3.3 and article 3.4 of the Kyoto Protocol, only carbon sinks in managed forests resulted from additional human activities are eligible for crediting. Ikusei-rin or managed forests (forests where practices for establishment and maintenance of even-aged have been undertaken after clear cut or selective cut) and Tennensei-rin or naturally regenerated forests (forests where practices such as establishment and maintenance depending mainly on natural regeneration are carried out) are the two forest types that Japan has chosen for management. Carbon sinks under FM option could be eligible for fulfilment of its GHG emission reductions target. According to report released by the government of Japan (Japanese Government, 2007
), proportion of FM as considered to be eligible under the Kyoto Protocol agreement ranges from 0.31 (31 per cent of the respective forest area) in Shikoku, Kyushu, Chukoku and Kinki regions to 0.48 in Tohoku, Hokuriku, Kita Kanto and Toyama regions, with a weighted average of 0.39 (39 per cent) for Sugi plantations managed by private landowners and to as high as 0.66 for Sugi plantations managed by the state (Table 3). The proportion of FM for Hinoki plantation managed by private land owners ranges from 0.48 to 0.53 with a weighted average of 0.50, but the proportion of FM in national forests is 0.66 for all regions and species (Table 3). The differences in the proportion are due mainly to the decrease in domestic timber price which encouraged private land owners to temporarily abandon their management activities in contrast to the state (government) whose budget availability permits the continuous management of forests.
|
Table 3 can be rearranged (Table 4) in such a way that the information can be used for estimating potential eligible carbon sinks in Japanese forests during the first commitment period. According to Table 4, weighted averages of the proportion of FM in Japan are estimated at 0.48 (48 per cent) and 0.60 (60 per cent) for plantation and natural forests, respectively (Table 4).
|
By taking these 0.48 and 0.60 proportions as the proportions of eligible forests for the whole modelling period, eligible carbon sinks due to FM are estimated at 7.3 and 2.9 TgC year–1 in plantation and natural forests, respectively. Totally, Japanese forests are able to sequestrate
10.2 TgC annually during the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol between 2008 and 2012, reaching 78.7 per cent of the capped amount of 13 TgC, the maximum amount of carbon sinks that Japan can use to meet its GHG reduction commitment as agreed under the Marrakesh Accord (UNFCCC, 2002
9.7 TgC year–1, only 0.5 TgC less than our findings. Sensitivity analysis
BEF play a major role in estimating carbon stock in forests as needed for the GHG reporting under the climate convention (Lehtonen et al., 2007
). The BEF used in equation (1) varies depending not only on the four forest type classes considered in this study (Table 1) but also on tree species, the age of the forests and a number of other factors including altitude, climate, provenance, soil type and management (Lehtonen et al., 2004
). Uncertainty surrounding BEF is the greatest potential source of error in estimating carbon stock change in natural and plantation forests (Lehtonen et al., 2007
). Dividing the estimates among species and age classes, and using separate BEFs for each, could go a long way towards reducing this uncertainty.
FM rates affect the eligible carbon sinks in Japanese forests. Because of Japan's commitment to improve carbon stocks in the forests through thinning and subsidies providing to forest owners coupled with the adoption in December 2002 of a 10-year FM action plan aiming to achieve maximum carbon sinks in the forests (Matsushita and Taguchi, 2006
), the rates of FM are likely to increase, leading to the increase of eligible carbon sinks. Therefore, a 13 TgC year–1 cap of carbon sinks in forest sector could be achieved.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study provides an estimate of forest land use change, carbon stock changes and carbon sequestration in Japanese forests, under current management practices, between 1966 and 2012. Due to government policies aimed at meeting increasing demand for domestic timber after World War II, a large portion of natural forests has been replaced by plantation forests whose commercial timber growth and yield is much greater. Between 1966 and 1984, the area of natural forest area decreased at an annual rate of 0.72 per cent. Carbon stocks in natural forests increased slowly, while they increased rapidly in plantation forests over the same period. During the first commitment period of the Kyoto protocol, Japanese forests are likely to sequester 20.1 TgC year–1, of which 10.2 TgC is considered as eligible carbon sinks, or
78.7 per cent of the capped amount of 13 TgC year–1. Further effort, i.e. intensive thinning by the governmental and private forest owners, is needed to accelerate the growth and therefore increase more carbon sinks in Japanese forests. Nevertheless, our study results suggest that Japanese forests play a vital role in climate change mitigation. | Funding |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Sumitomo Foundation (Number 043195); the Hyogo Science and Technology Association and the Charles Bullard Fellowship in Forest Research for Advanced Research and Study.
| Conflict of Interest Statement |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Authors gratefully thank editor and reviewers for their invaluable comments.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Brown S. Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: a primer. (1997) No. 134, Rome, Italy.
CGER. Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report in Japan in 2005 (2005) Tsukuba, Japan: Greenhouse Gas Inventory Office.
Fang J, Oikawa T, Kato T, Mo W, Wang Z. Biomass carbon accumulation by Japan's forests from 1947 to 1995. Global Biogeochem. Cycles. (2005) 19:1–10.[Medline]
Fearnside PM. Greenhouse gases from deforestation in Brazilian Amazonia: net committed emissions. Clim. Change. (1997) 35:321–360.[CrossRef]
Forestry Agency. Forest and Forestry Statistical Survey (special edition) (2005) Tokyo, Japan. Forestry Agency,
Fukuda M, Iehara T, Matsumoto M. Carbon stock estimates for Sugi and Hinoki forests in Japan. For. Ecol. Manage. (2003) 184:1–16.[CrossRef]
Galbraith JM, Kleinman JAP, Bryant BR. Sources of uncertainty affecting soil organic carbon estimates in Northern New York. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. (2003) 67:1206–1212.
Hiroshima T, Nakajima T. Estimation of sequestered carbon in Article-3.4 private planted forests in the first commitment period in Japan. J. Jpn. For. Res. (2006) 11:427–437.
Hosoda K. Growth performance and characteristics of Sugi plantation in low productivity land – a case study at Okushima Mount experimental site (in Japanese). (1997) http://www.fsm.affrc.go.jp/Nenpou/39/ (accessed on 3 August, 2007).
Hosoda K. Growth performance of Sugi plantation at various snow zones – a case study in Rokuman mount experimental site. (1998) Report of the FFPRI Kansai Office No. 40 (in Japanese). http://www.fsm.affrc.go.jp/Nenpou/40/p39.html (accessed on 3 August, 2007).
Hosoda K. Growth performance of Sugi plantation in Sanin region – a case study at Shinotani Mount experiemental site. (1999) Report of the FFPRI Kansai Office No. 41 (in Japanese). http://www.fsm.affrc.go.jp/Nenpou/41/p32.html (accessed on 3 August, 2007).
Hyams GD. CurveFit Expert 1.3. Online Software (2007) http://curveexpert.webhop.biz/ (accessed on 18 February, 2007).
Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2001 (2001) Cambridge, United Kingdom and New york, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Japan FAO Association. Forests and Forestry in Japan (1997) 2nd edn. Tokyo, Japan: Japan FAO Association.
Japan Forestry Foundation. Forestry Statistical Survey (special edition) (1992) Tokyo, Japan: Japan Forestry Foundation. (in Japanese).
Japanese Government. Report of the LULUCF Activities under Articles 3.3 and 3.4 of the Kyoto Protocol (in Japanese) (2007) www.env.go.jp/earth/ondanka/mechanism/hosoku/KP-NIR_J-1.pdf (accessed on 18 March, 2008).
Jung M. The history of sinks – an analysis of negotiating positions in the climate regime (2004) Hamburg: HWWA. 1–30. HWWA Discussion Paper 293.
Kim Phat N, Knorr W, Kim S. Appropriate measures for conservation of terrestrial carbon stocks – analysis of trends of forest management in Southeast Asia. For. Ecol. Manage. (2004) 191:283–299.[CrossRef]
Knorr W, Prentice IC, House JI, Holland EA. Long-term sensitivity of soil carbon turnover to warming. Nature (2005) 433:298–301.[CrossRef]
Lehtonen A, Makipaa R, Heikkinen J, Sievanena R, Liskic J. Biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests. For. Ecol. Manage. (2004) 188:211–222.[CrossRef]
Lehtonen A, Cienciala E, Tatarinov F, Makipaa. Uncertainty estimation of biomass expansion factors for Norway spruce in the Czech Republic. Ann. For. Sci. (2007) 64:133–140.[CrossRef]
Lin K.-C., Duh C.-T., Huang C.-M., Wang C.-P. Estimate of coarse root biomass and nutrient contents of trees in a subtropical broadleaf forest in Taiwan. Taiwan J. For. Sci. (2006) 21(2):155–166.
Matsumura N, Kotani H, Tsuduki N. Analysis of the Impacts of Thinning on Old-Aged Sugi and Hinoki Plantations – Case Studies at Nichino Kawa Mount Growth Experimental Site (1999) Report of the FFPRI Shikoku Office, pp. 33–36 (in Japanese).
Matsushita K, Taguchi K. The Kyoto Protocol and private forest policy of local governments in Japan. In: Small-Scale Forestry and Rural Development: The Intersection of Ecosystems, Economics and Society—Wall S, ed. (2006) 262–275. Proceedings of IUFRO 3.08 Conference, 18–23rd June 2006, Galway, Ireland,
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF). Agriculture and Forestry Sensus in 2000 (2000) http://www.maff.go.jp/census/past/stats_r01.html (accessed on 13 March, 2008).
Richards FJ. A flexible growth function for empirical use. J. Exp. Bot. (1959) 10:290–300.
Takeuchi I. The growth of diameters and stand stem volumes in old man-made Sugi (Cryptomeria japonica) stands. J. Jpn. For. Soc. (2005) 87:394–401.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Decision 14/CP.7. In: In FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.1. Conference of the Parties, Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Seventh Session, Held at Marrakesh from 29 October to 10 November 2001 (2002) 54–67.
Yoshimoto A, Marusak R. Evaluation of carbon sequestration and thinning regimes within the optimization framework for forest stand management. Eur. J. For. Res. (2007) 126:315–329.
Received 2 April 2008.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||




