Skip Navigation


Forestry Advance Access originally published online on July 7, 2009
Forestry 2009 82(4):463-477; doi:10.1093/forestry/cpp019
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
82/4/463    most recent
cpp019v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Augusto, L.
Right arrow Articles by Saur, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Institute of Chartered Foresters, 2009. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Estimation of nutrient content of woody plants using allometric relationships: quantifying the difference between concentration values from the literature and actuals

Laurent Augusto1,*, Mark R. Bakker2, Christine De Lavaissière1, Lionel Jordan-Meille2 and Etienne Saur2

1 INRA, UMR 1220 TCEM, F-33883 Villenave d'Ornon, France
2 ENITA de Bordeaux, UMR 1220 TCEM, F-33883 Villenave d'Ornon, France

* Corresponding author. E-mail: laugusto{at}bordeaux.inra.fr


  Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability of allometric methods for assessing biomass and nutrient contents of woody species at the stand scale. Allometric relationships were built from 13 stands of a woody species of moderate height (European gorse: Ulex europaeus L.). In eight other stands, the above-ground biomass of the species was estimated using allometric relationships. Total nutrient contents (N, P, K, Ca, Mg) of these eight stands were also computed either with nutrient concentrations obtained from local stratified samples or with values derived from the literature. The estimated above-ground biomass was consistent with the measured values obtained by complete harvest of the stand. The nutrient contents calculated using the local samples were also in agreement with measured values. Conversely, the use of nutrient concentrations values derived from the literature led to significant errors which were up to 104 per cent in the estimation of nutrient contents. We conclude that allometric methods can give reliable and accurate estimates of above-ground biomass and nutrient content of woody species, provided that the values for nutrient concentrations are obtained from local samples and not from average values found in the literature.

Received 14 May 2008.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.