Skip Navigation


Forestry Advance Access originally published online on November 4, 2008
Forestry 2009 82(1):43-59; doi:10.1093/forestry/cpn048
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
82/1/43    most recent
cpn048v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nørgaard Nielsen, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Rasmussen, H. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Institute of Chartered Foresters, 2008. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Frost hardening and dehardening in Abies procera and other conifers under differing temperature regimes and warm-spell treatments

C. Christian Nørgaard Nielsen* and Hanne N. Rasmussen

Department of Forestry, University of Copenhagen, 11 Hørsholm Kongevej, DK-2970 Hørsholm, Denmark

* Corresponding author. E-mail: cnn{at}life.ku.dk


  Abstract

Frequent bud frost damage in cultivation of Abies procera Rehder and pending climate changes are the background for this study of cold hardiness under varying acclimation regime (in closed-top chambers) and experimental warm spells during the cold season. LT50 values were established by freezing tests at different times of year. Damage and deaths were assessed on leader buds, subapical lateral buds, needles and cambium. Minor parallel experiments involved Abies nordmanniana, Picea abies and Picea sitchensis. Lower acclimation temperatures resulted in deeper frost hardiness during late autumn but less during spring, compared with ambient temperature controls. Elevated temperatures resulted in less deep frost resistance. Apical buds generally developed deeper frost hardiness than lateral buds but less deep than the cambium, varying with species, however. Frost damage in buds ranged from death over partially destroyed bud contents resulting in distorted shoots to buds seemingly remaining dormant. Responses to warm spells differed with duration, timing and species, ranging from dramatic decrease in frost hardiness with or without subsequent recovery to no reaction. Furthermore, the reactions did not show any clear relation to dormancy level. For A. procera, exposure to fluctuating temperatures appeared to be particularly problematic. This explains why this species develops best in coastal climates, and in sites sheltered from temperature extremes either by hedging, a winter snow cover, or topography. The Christmas tree production will suffer severely on sites with harsh temperatures due to losses of lateral and terminal buds, which destroy the crown symmetry. Clipping of greenery is less influenced by frost damages, although the development of normal branch whorls is often disturbed.

Received 19 November 2008.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.