Skip Navigation


Forestry Advance Access originally published online on October 24, 2007
Forestry 2007 80(5):587-611; doi:10.1093/forestry/cpm039
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
80/5/587    most recent
cpm039v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lindgren, P. M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Winter, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Institute of Chartered Foresters, 2007. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Growth response of young lodgepole pine to thinning and repeated fertilization treatments: 10-year results

P. M. F. Lindgren1, T. P. Sullivan2,*, D. S. Sullivan1, R. P. Brockley3 and R. Winter4

1 Applied Mammal Research Institute, 11010 Mitchell Avenue, Summerland, British Columbia, Canada V0H 1Z8
2 Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Sciences, 2424 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4
3 Kalamalka Research Station, Ministry of Forests and Range, 3401 Reservoir Road, Vernon, British Columbia, Canada V1B 2C7
4 Forest Practices Branch, Ministry of Forests and Range, 727 Fisgard Street, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 9C2

* Corresponding author. E-mail: tom.sullivan{at}ubc.ca


  Abstract

This study was designed to test the hypothesis that large-scale pre-commercial thinning (PCT) to various stand densities, at ages 12–14 years, combined with repeated fertilization, would, over a 10-year treatment period, enhance productivity of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm.) crop trees. Study areas were located near Summerland, Kelowna and Williams Lake in south-central British Columbia, Canada. Each study area had nine treatments: four pairs of stands thinned to densities of ~250 (very low), ~500 (low), ~1000 (medium) and ~2000 (high) stems ha–1, with one stand of each pair fertilized five times at 2-year intervals, and an unthinned stand. The very low, low- and medium-density stands were also pruned to a 3-m lift 5 years after thinning. At the tree level, fertilization treatments significantly increased diameter at breast height (DBH), basal area (BA) and volume growth and heavy PCT significantly increased DBH and BA growth. Pruning may mitigate some of the negative stem form and wood quality attributes associated with fast-growing trees without adversely affecting stem growth. At the stand level, PCT to very low and low densities significantly decreased the volume growth compared with high-density stands. The potential beneficial impacts that PCT and repeated fertilization treatments have for mitigating timber supply shortfalls, as well as potentially minimizing crop tree losses due to mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopk.), are also discussed.

Received 26 March 2007.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.