Forestry Advance Access originally published online on November 22, 2005
Forestry 2006 79(1):3-27; doi:10.1093/forestry/cpi056
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Designing forest vegetation management strategies based on the mechanisms and dynamics of crop tree competition by neighbouring vegetation
1 Cemagref, Team of Applied Ecology of Woodlands, Clermont-Ferrand Regional Centre, 24 avenue des Landais, BP 50085, F-63172 Aubière Cedex, France
2 INRA, Laboratoire d’Etude des Ressources Forêt-Bois, UMR INRA-ENGREF 1092, F-54 280 Champenoux, France
3 Southern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, Auburn, AL 36849-5418, USA
4 NRCan, Canadian Forest Service, 1219 Queen St East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 2E5
5 Department of Forestry (0324), College of Natural Resources, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
* Corresponding author. E-mail: philippe.balandier{at}cemagref.fr
Plant interactions can be defined as the ways plants act upon the growth, fitness, survival and reproduction of other plants, largely by modifying their environment. These interactions can be positive (facilitation) or negative (competition or exploitation). During plantation establishment or natural forest regeneration after a disturbance, high light levels and, sometimes, increased availability of water and nutrients favour the development of opportunistic, fast-growing herbaceous and woody species which capture resources at the expense of crop trees. As a consequence, the growth and survival of crop trees can be dramatically reduced. Although the effects of this competition are well documented, the physical and physiological mechanisms of competition are not. Moreover, the competition process is never constant in time or space. We present a conceptual competition model based on plant growth forms common in global forests, i.e. graminoids, forbs, small shrubs, large shrubs and mid-storey trees, and main-storey trees. Their competitive attributes and successional dynamics are examined. An overview is presented on the way forest vegetation management (FVM) treatments influence these components and outcomes regarding crop tree performance and diversity conservation. Finally, a synthesis of literature yields FVM guidelines for efficiently optimizing crop tree performance and safeguarding diversity. Future research needs to further sustainable FVM are presented.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. Ammer and R. Mosandl Which grow better under the canopy of Norway spruce planted or sown seedlings of European beech? Forestry, October 1, 2007; 80(4): 385 - 395. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Prevosto and P. Balandier Influence of nurse birch and Scots pine seedlings on early aerial development of European beech seedlings in an open-field plantation of Central France Forestry, July 1, 2007; 80(3): 253 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|