Skip Navigation


Forestry Advance Access originally published online on October 12, 2005
Forestry 2005 78(5):471-484; doi:10.1093/forestry/cpi053
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
78/5/471    most recent
cpi053v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gardiner, B.
Right arrow Articles by Wood, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Institute of Chartered Foresters, 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The stability of different silvicultural systems: a wind-tunnel investigation

Barry Gardiner1,*, Bryan Marshall2,3, Alexis Achim1, Rex Belcher2 and Colin Wood2

1 Forestry Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9SY, Scotland
2 Wind Engineering Research Group, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PJ
3 MathEngine Ltd, Mill Street, Oxford OX2 OXJ

* Corresponding author. E-mail: barry.gardiner{at}forestry.gsi.gov.uk

We report on a wind-tunnel study with 1 : 75 scale model trees designed to examine the influence of canopy structure on the formation of turbulent gusts above forests. This was to test the hypothesis that more irregular canopy structures produce less intense gusts because the change in wind speed with height at canopy top is less severe. Measurements were made of wind speeds and turbulence within and above the model forests and of the wind loading on model trees in four different silvicultural systems. The systems tested were even-aged, single-tree selection, shelterwood/group selection and strip felling. The measurements showed that the profiles of different mean wind and turbulence characteristics above the forests are remarkably similar when vertical heights are normalized by the height of the tallest tree but differences do exist within the canopy. The wind loading measurements indicated no difference between the systems in terms of stability except possibly for the shelterwood/group selection. In the shelterwood/group selection system the presence of smaller sub-canopy trees appears to reduce the loading on the main canopy trees either by providing support and increasing damping or by absorption of energy from the canopy-penetrating gusts.

Received 10 December 2004.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ForestryHome page
S. Dupont and Y. Brunet
Impact of forest edge shape on tree stability: a large-eddy simulation study
Forestry, July 1, 2008; 81(3): 299 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ForestryHome page
B. Gardiner, K. Byrne, S. Hale, K. Kamimura, S. J. Mitchell, H. Peltola, and J.-C. Ruel
A review of mechanistic modelling of wind damage risk to forests
Forestry, July 1, 2008; 81(3): 447 - 463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ForestryHome page
M. J. Schelhaas
The wind stability of different silvicultural systems for Douglas-fir in the Netherlands: a model-based approach
Forestry, July 1, 2008; 81(3): 399 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ForestryHome page
C. Frank and B. Ruck
Numerical study of the airflow over forest clearings
Forestry, July 1, 2008; 81(3): 259 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Bot.Home page
H. M. Peltola
Mechanical stability of trees under static loads
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1501 - 1511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.