Skip Navigation


Forestry Advance Access originally published online on June 8, 2005
Forestry 2005 78(4):433-442; doi:10.1093/forestry/cpi039
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
78/4/433    most recent
cpi039v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chrimes, D.
Right arrow Articles by Nilson, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Institute of Chartered Foresters, 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Overstorey density influence on the height of Picea abies regeneration in northern Sweden

Dillon Chrimes* and Kristina Nilson

Department of Silviculture, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-901 83 Umeå, Sweden

* Corresponding author. Present address: Box 430, Highway 17 West, Mattawa Ontario, Canada P0H 1V0. E-mail: dillon.chrimes{at}canadianecology.ca

The study aimed specifically at investigating if canopy openness was a better predictor of the height growth of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) advance regeneration than overstorey basal area or overstorey standing volume. In 1990, a field experiment with 3 x 2 factorial design and two replications (blocks) was established in an uneven-aged Norway spruce forest. Plots had a net plot area of 30 x 30 m, each with a 10-m-wide treated buffer zone. Three overstorey density levels retained approximately 15, 40 and 70 per cent of the pre-harvest overstorey standing volume and were allotted to the plots. Two types of thinning that harvested smaller trees or harvested larger trees were randomly allocated to each pair of overstorey density plots. In mid-June 2000, canopy openness was estimated from hemispherical photographs taken at five marked points in the centre of each of the plots at 0.9 m from ground to the top of the ‘fish-eye’ camera lens. Regression results showed that canopy openness was a better predictor of height increments of spruce seedlings (0.1< height < 0.5 m), saplings (0.5 ≤ height < 2.0 m), and small trees (height ≥ 2.0 m, diameter at 1.3 m height < 5 cm) than with overstorey basal area (m2 ha–1) or overstorey standing volume (m3 ha–1). The height increment of the spruce advance regeneration was not significantly correlated to stand basal area or to standing volume. Overstorey basal area in the net plots was significantly negative (P ≤ 0.05) with mean canopy openness estimates, and the r2 value was 0.40. Results indicated that basal area was not linearly related to canopy openness as it increased, which might explain the lack of predictive power of retained basal area on spruce regeneration height in dense stands in boreal Sweden.

Received 26 January 2005.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.