Skip Navigation


Forestry Advance Access originally published online on August 8, 2005
Forestry 2005 78(4):337-351; doi:10.1093/forestry/cpi046
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
78/4/337    most recent
cpi046v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donoso, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Institute of Chartered Foresters, 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Crown Index: a canopy balance indicator to assess growth and regeneration in uneven-aged forest stands of the Coastal Range of Chile

Pablo J. Donoso*

Instituto de Silvicultura, Universidad Austral de Chile, Casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile

* E-mail: pdonoso{at}uach.cl

A balanced diameter structure, i.e. similar crown area allocated to the different cohorts in uneven-aged forest stands, has been traditionally regarded as a requirement for achieving better growth rates and regeneration. Long-term experiments have demonstrated the sustainability of these structures, but quantitative data informing on how growth and regeneration behave under a balanced diameter structure compared with other structures have been scarce. Similarly, vertical structure has not been properly accounted for as a variable that can affect growth and regeneration in uneven-aged stands. In this study a Crown Index (CI) was used as a surrogate of a balanced diameter structure and an indicator of vertical structure. This new index is obtained by dividing the canopy area of trees in the main and upper canopy positions in a stand by the canopy area in lower strata. A CI of 1.0 indicates, on average, an even allocation of canopy area to each of four strata, namely, a balanced structure; values >1.0 or <1.0 reflect unbalanced structures, with excess canopy cover of large trees or medium and small trees, respectively. From data obtained from stands at relatively poorer and better sites in uncut and partially cut old-growth stands in the Coastal Cordillera of southern Chile, the effects of CI, proportion of large and small trees, canopy area, and basal area on diameter growth of Laurelia philippiana Looser (Monimiaceae) – the most important species in these forests – and regeneration of all canopy tree species were tested. Results indicated the following: the CI was most strongly correlated to the proportion of large and of small trees (i.e. structural indicator), and to a lesser extent to basal area (a density indicator); the CI was by far the best explanatory variable of growth at better sites and of regeneration at poor sites; and, in general, greater growth and more seedlings occurred as CI values decreased towards 1, which reflects a balanced diameter structure. Results support the value of balanced diameter structures in managed uneven-aged stands, but also suggest that alternative structures could be sought.

Received 27 August 2003.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.