Skip Navigation


Forestry Advance Access originally published online on May 23, 2005
Forestry 2005 78(3):263-278; doi:10.1093/forestry/cpi024
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
78/3/263    most recent
cpi024v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, P.
Right arrow Articles by Barker, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Institute of Chartered Foresters, 2005. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Impact of riparian buffer guidelines on old growth in western boreal forests of Canada

Philip Lee1,* and Tim Barker2

1 Integrated Landscape Management Program, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E9
2 Daishowa Marubeni International Ltd, Postal Bag 6500, Pulp Mill Site, Peace River, Alberta, Canada T8S 1V5

* Corresponding author. E-mail: philipl{at}ualberta.ca

As timber harvest expands over a previously unharvested landbase, riparian buffers will make up an increasing proportion of old-growth forests. This study examined the impact of different criteria for the formulation of riparian buffers on the temporal supply of old-growth forests in western boreal Canada. Three common criteria were applied through computer simulation over an ~313 000-ha timber merchantable landbase for a 200-year time horizon. Guideline criteria included: (1) broad prescriptive approach, i.e. few-sizes-fit-all; (2) special management of fish-bearing streams; and (3) two-zone, partial harvest buffers. While the numerical results are specific to this study area, they suggested five general results applicable to forest planning. (1) Regardless of the criteria for buffers, old growth accumulated over the first 40–60 years thereafter it dropped to 2–4 per cent of the total landbase after 100 years. (2) Guidelines recognizing fish-bearing water bodies retained more old growth, particularly conifer, because of their application to higher elevation and more intermittent stream types. Few-sizes-fit-all retained the most deciduous and mixed-wood old growth, i.e. low elevation forest types. Two-zone buffers exhibited less temporal variance but an overall lower amount of old growth. (3) Operational and field interpretations of the few-sizes-fit-all guidelines retained three times more riparian area and three to seven times more old growth than just the planning phase alone. (4) Old-growth mixed-wood forests virtually disappeared from both timber harvest and riparian landbases. (5) The primary location of old growth shifted from the harvest to the riparian landbase.


Received 1 March 2004.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.