Skip Navigation

Erratum for Lowe et al., Forestry 77 (4) 335-347.
Forestry 2005 78(1):105; doi:10.1093/forestry/78.1.105-a
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Institute of Chartered Foresters, 2005

Erratum

Errata

Forestry Volume 77, Number 4, 2004

The utility and limitations of chloroplast DNA analysis for identifying native British oak stands and for guiding replanting strategy A. Lowe, R. Munro, S. Samuel and J. Cottrell pp. 335-347 Figures 3 & 4 [doi:10.1093/forestry/epi011]

Oxford University Press would like to point out that the legends supplied for each figure was incorrect and should be as follows:

Figure 3. cpDNA type of 75 trees selected across Britain due to their superior phenotype (from Hubert and Savill, 1999).

Figure 4. Distribution of cpDNA haplotypes within samples from 16 stands used as seed sources. The size of pie is proportional to the number of samples taken. For most stands, five trees were genotyped, the exceptions are Dymock (n = 26), Blackney (n = 15), Mousecastle Woods (n = 10), Drummond Castle, Edge Ed and Sutton Bottom (n = 9) and Bradley Hill (n = 3).

Both the publisher and the authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience this may have caused.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.