Skip Navigation

Forestry 2004 77(5):441-453; doi:10.1093/forestry/77.5.441
© 2004 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slee, B.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Forestry in the rural economy: a new approach to assessing the impact of forestry on rural development

Bill Slee1 *, Deb Roberts2 and Rhys Evans3

1 Countryside and Community Research Unit, University of Gloucestershire GL50 4AZ, England, 2 Arkleton Centre for Rural Development and Department of Land Economy, University of Aberdeen AB24 3UF, Scotland, 3 Centre for Mountain Studies, University of Highlands and Islands, Perth PH1 2NX, Scotland

Forestry contributes to the rural economy in a number of ways: directly as a user of land and resources to transform biological and other inputs into a range of outputs; indirectly through its linkages with upstream suppliers and downstream processing sectors; through the re-spending in rural areas of parts of income derived from forestry and its related industries; through the provision of non-market benefits; and in more opaque, though nonetheless important ways, in providing a desirable location for non-forestry-related business activity and a living environment which many people find attractive. The full range of these economic benefits can be more or less easily enumerated and are likely to vary very substantially from one region to another. In some areas, the forest production sector may be the greater contributor to rural economic well-being; in others the local forest-dependent spending associated with firms and households living in a tree-rich environment might contribute more to local economies than the benefits arising from production forestry. This points to the need for a strong degree of regional, and perhaps more local, differentiation in forest policy and practice, based on a sound knowledge of the relative contributions of different benefit streams (and costs) in particular locations and of the potential trade-offs between production and amenity. This paper presents a new approach to estimating the impact of forestry on rural development and applies this to a case-study area in England.


* Corresponding author. E-mail: bslee{at}glos.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.