Skip Navigation

Forestry 2004 77(5):421-430; doi:10.1093/forestry/77.5.421
© 2004 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levy, P.E.
Right arrow Articles by Nicoll, B.C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Biomass expansion factors and root : shoot ratios for coniferous tree species in Great Britain

P.E. Levy1 *, S.E. Hale2 and B.C. Nicoll2

1 Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 0QB, Scotland, 2 Forest Research, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9SY, Scotland

Biomass expansion factors (the ratio of the total above-ground tree biomass to the biomass of the merchantable timber, Bef) and root : shoot ratios (R) are commonly used in converting standing volumes of timber into total carbon stocks, for the purpose of national inventories of greenhouse gas emissions and sequestration. However, much of the uncertainty in these estimates of carbon stocks is attributable to uncertainty in the Bef and R parameters, as they are not measured in standard forestry practice and are rarely measured on a large scale in research work. Here, we present measurements which represent the largest available data set on which estimates of Bef and R can be based for coniferous species in Great Britain. Bef varied between 1.04 and 2.32, with a mean of 1.43 0.008, whilst R varied from 0.12 to 1.21, with a mean of 0.36 0.008. Tree height accounted for 45 per cent of the variance in Bef in a logarithmic regression. Differences between species accounted for 27 per cent of the remaining variance. Equations to estimate the value of Bef for a given species and tree height are provided. No continuous variable accounted for >5 per cent of the variance in R. Differences between sites accounted for 25 per cent of the variance in R, and the effects of species, soil type and cultivation method were of lesser significance. Values of R used in some recent UK studies are lower than our values. If our results are representative, more carbon is present in UK conifer forests than is estimated in these studies, and the R terms should be increased by up to 0.2.

* Corresponding author. E-mail: plevy{at}ceh.ac.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ForestryHome page
B. Gardiner, K. Byrne, S. Hale, K. Kamimura, S. J. Mitchell, H. Peltola, and J.-C. Ruel
A review of mechanistic modelling of wind damage risk to forests
Forestry, July 1, 2008; 81(3): 447 - 463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.