Skip Navigation

Forestry 2004 77(5):397-403; doi:10.1093/forestry/77.5.397
© 2004 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gosling, P. G.
Right arrow Articles by Baker, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Six chemicals with animal repellent or insecticide properties are screened for phytotoxic effects on the germination and viability of ash, birch, Corsican pine and sycamore seeds

Peter G. Gosling1 * and Corinne Baker2

1 Forestry Commission Research Agency, 2 Seed Trading, Plant and Seed Supply Branch, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, Surrey GU10 4LH, England

As a prelude to direct sowing experiments, a laboratory study was carried out to determine whether six chemicals with insect and/or rodent repellent properties (Aaprotect, Capsaicin, Guardsman, Hallmark, Scuttle, Treeguard) affected the germination capacities and/or viability percentages of European ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.), silver birch (Betula pendula L.), Corsican pine (Pinus nigra ssp. laricio L.) and sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) seeds. None of the chemical repellents had a significant effect on either the germination capacity or viability of ash or birch seeds. One repellent (Guardsman) significantly reduced the germination capacity of sycamore from 49 to 32 per cent (P 0.01). Two repellents (Aaprotect and Scuttle) significantly reduced the germination capacity of Corsican pine from 74 to 62 per cent (P 0.05) and 11 per cent (P 0.001), respectively. Corsican pine was therefore the most sensitive of the species investigated to phytotoxic effects. Viability percentages (at the end of germination tests on repellent-treated seeds) showed that virtually all ungerminated seeds were dead. Greater phytotoxicity was observed for small-seeded species when they were incubated on a substrate of moist filter paper than when they were sown in moist peat + sand. One explanation is that the larger volume of peat + sand in the seed-tray allowed the chemicals to leach away from the seeds more quickly. Alternatively, perhaps the peat inactivated the chemicals through adsorption. The results are used to exclude certain chemical and tree seed combinations from future seed predation studies associated with direct sowing.

* Corresponding author. E-mail: peter.gosling{at}forestry.gsi.gov.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.