Skip Navigation

Forestry 2004 77(3):235-247; doi:10.1093/forestry/77.3.235
© 2004 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rock, J.
Right arrow Articles by Schulte, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Spatial aspects of the influence of silver birch (Betula pendula L.) on growth and quality of young oaks (Quercus spp.) in central Germany

J. RockA1,*, K.J. PuettmannA2, H.A. GockelA3 and A. SchulteA4

A1 Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Telegrafenberg A 51, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany A2 Department of Forest Science, Oregon State University, 321 Richardson Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331-5752, USA A3 Staatliches Forstamt Bad Driburg, Stiftstr. 15, D-33014 Bad Driburg, Germany A4 Institute of Landscape Ecology, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Robert-Koch-Strasse 26, D-48149 Münster, Germany

This study was carried out to examine the influence of interference by silver birch (Betula pendula L.) on oaks (Quercus spp.) planted in clusters. On two sites in the north-eastern Hessian Mountains, Germany, transects starting with a birch were laid through oak clusters. Height, diameter at breast height (d.b.h.) and crown radii of the birch and the nearest three oaks on the transect were taken. The stem form and crown type of the oaks were noted and distances between birch and oaks were measured. Oaks on transects with birch interference were compared with oaks from birch-free transects. Results showed that, on the site where oaks were smaller, the birch did not consistently influence oak growth. On the other hand, the larger oaks on the second site were negatively influenced by the competing birch. Other measures than height or d.b.h. growth may be a more sensitive indicator of competition as all oaks shifted their crown centre away from the birch. Also, the proportion of trees with good stem form increased with the distance from the birch and the ratio of trees with bent stems decreased. Crown type was not affected by interference. To generalize, foresters should pay attention to the spatial aspects of birch, i.e. its location with reference to neighbouring oaks, and they may be able to use crown shift as an indicator of when to remove overtopping birch competitors before they influence growth of oak.


* Corresponding author. E-mail: rock{at}pik-potsdam.de


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.