Skip Navigation

Forestry 2004 77(2):107-117; doi:10.1093/forestry/77.2.107
© 2004 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hallsby, G.
Right arrow Articles by Örlander, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

A comparison of mounding and inverting to establish Norway spruce on podzolic soils in Sweden

G. HallsbyA1,* and G. ÖrlanderA2

A1 Department of Silviculture, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE 901 83 Umeå, Sweden A2 School of Industrial Engineering, Växjö University, SE 351 95 Växjö, Sweden

The study comprised 12 semi-practical field trials on 1–2-year-old clearcuts distributed from 57 to 65° N on podzolic soils. The objective of the study was to evaluate if inverting site preparation should be recommended as an alternative to mounding when both regeneration results andenvironmental effects were considered. Five growing seasons after planting with Norway spruce (Picea abies L Karst.) stock, improved seedling survival was found following inverting (78 per cent) compared with mounding (65 per cent) and unscarified controls (57 per cent). Height increment following inverting (46 cm) and mounding (42 cm) was significantly higher than for unscarified controls (32 cm). When the target number of site preparation spots was 2500 per hectare, the rate of altered ground contour on mounding plots was 40 per cent, whereas a lower rate of altered ground contour was found after inverting (15 per cent). However, comparing total surface disturbance, the difference between mounding and inverting was negligible. Improved plantation establishment following inverting can be expected on a majority of the normal plantation sites in Sweden and elsewhere in boreal forests where conditions are similar. Inverting needs to be improved technically before the potential benefits of reduced soil disturbance will be attained.


* Corresponding author. E-mail: goran.hallsby{at}ssko.slu.se


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.