Skip Navigation

Forestry 2002 75(4):483-488; doi:10.1093/forestry/75.4.483
© 2002 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Andreassen, K.
Right arrow Articles by Øyen, B.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Economic consequences of three silvicultural methods in uneven-aged mature coastal spruce forests of central Norway

K. Andreassen1 and B.-H. Øyen2

1 Norwegian Forest Research Institute, Høgskoleveien 12, 1432 Ås, Norway 2 Norwegian Forest Research Institute – Bergen, Fanaflaten 4, 5244 Fana, Norway

Six experimental sites in the coastal spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) forest of central Norway were used as the basis of an economic investigation of three silvicultural systems: a single tree selection system, a group system and clearcutting. The mean tree volume removed in the selection system was 0.6 m3, and ~0.3 m3 for the other two methods. The harvesting cost was ~14 euro/m3 for clearcutting, and about 10 per cent higher for the group and selection systems. In simulations of future revenues and expenses, the net present value (NPV) was approximately 15 per cent lower for the group and selection systems compared with clearcutting. Lower volume production in uneven-aged stands and higher administration and harvesting costs had only a minor influence on the NPV. All calculations were carried out using a 2 per cent discount rate, a 3 per cent rate lowered the NPV of the group and selection systems to 75 per cent of the clearcutting method.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.