Skip Navigation

Forestry 2001 74(3):271-276; doi:10.1093/forestry/74.3.271
© 2001 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feber, R.E.
Right arrow Articles by Oates, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The impacts of deer on woodland butterflies: the good, the bad and the complex

R.E. Feber1, T.M. Brereton1, M.S. Warren1 and M. Oates2

1 Butterfly Conservation, Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset BH20 5QP, England 2 The National Trust, 33 Sheep Street, Cirencester, Gloucestershire GL7 1RQ, England

Deer grazing is an important feature of many key butterfly habitats in Britain, yet few data are available on its impacts. Butterfly populations can be affected in a number of ways, through effects on the local availability of larval food-plants or nectar sources, to larger-scale changes in habitat structure and management. Many woodland butterflies have historically relied on clearings in coppiced woodland, but current high numbers of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), and to a lesser extent fallow deer (Dama dama), can severely reduce tree regrowth and are now a major disincentive to the maintenance of this traditional form of management. In contrast, deer grazing may be very beneficial in some woodland habitats. In Scotland, most colonies of the threatened pearl-bordered fritillary (Boloria euphrosyne) rely to some extent on grazing by deer, to slow down natural regeneration and maintain open bracken (Pteridium aquilinum) habitats in canopy gaps and along woodland edges. Such areas have recently been targeted by schemes to encourage native woodland, but the fencing out of deer and other grazing animals can lead to rapid loss of these crucial woodland habitats. Far more research is needed to determine the full extent of these impacts and implications for conservation programmes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.