Skip Navigation

Forestry 2000 73(4):371-380; doi:10.1093/forestry/73.4.371
© 2000 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mathews, J.H.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, M.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The advantages and disadvantages of the application of genetic engineering to forest trees: a discussion

J.H. Mathews1 and M.M. Campbell1

1 Oxford, UK

This review briefly examines moral arguments for and against genetic engineering (GE) technology in trees, finding equal support for both sides of the debate. Subsequently, environmental costs and benefits are reviewed. Due to the complexity of tree–environment interactions, clear-cut answers are not forthcoming. However, some environmental risks are deemed to be potentially serious; the nature of such risks and possibilities for their containment are described. Assessment of such risks should be undertaken by interdisciplinary teams including ecologists and microbiologists, with the onus being on biotechnological scientists to prove, to the satisfaction of consumers, that the technology they produce is safe. A well-functioning regulatory mechanism is necessary if benefits of GE technology are to be maximized while keeping to a minimum any associated risks.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.