Skip Navigation

Forestry 2000 73(2):143-153; doi:10.1093/forestry/73.2.143
© 2000 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lindhagen, A.
Right arrow Articles by Hörnsten, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Forest recreation in 1977 and 1997 in Sweden: changes in public preferences and behaviour

A. Lindhagen1 and L. Hörnsten1

1 Department of Forest Management and Products, SLU, Uppsala, Sweden

This paper focuses on changes in the relationship of the Swedish public with the forest. By repeating a postal survey after 20 years, changes in the recreational use of forests, and preferences according to suitability of forest sites for outdoor recreation, are measured. The main result is that the changes are generally small. The visiting frequency remains unaltered and the typical Swede visits a forest for recreational purposes once a week in summer and once a fortnight during the winter. A few differences between the studies in 1977 and in 1997 were observed. The amount of wild berries picked for home consumption had decreased in 1997 to about one-third of the volume picked in 1977. A black and white photo of a virgin forest was considered a more suitable image for outdoor recreation in 1997. A Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) shelterwood was considered less suitable for outdoor recreation. It is concluded that the relationship with the forest is still close, but that public use is changing from harvesting towards purely recreational. Further conclusions are that new recommendations for silvicultural actions will be needed due to these changing preferences and that the conflict between recreational and biodiversity goals in forestry has slightly decreased.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.