Skip Navigation

Forestry 1999 72(4):367-378; doi:10.1093/forestry/72.4.367
© 1999 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harrison, A.
Right arrow Articles by Lindley, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Impacts of pollutant inputs on forest canopy condition in the UK: possible role of P limitations

AF HarrisonA1, J CarreiraA2, JM PoskittA1, SMC RobertsonA1, R SmithA3, J HallA4, M HornungA1 and DK LindleyA1

A1 Merlewood Research Station, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Grange-over-Sands, Cumbria, UK A2 Departamento de Biologia Animal, Vegetal y Ecologia, University of Jaen, Paraje Las Lagunillas, Edificio No. 5, 23071 Jaen, Spain A3 Bush Research Station, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Penicuik, Midlothian, UK A4 Monkswood Research Station, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon, Cambridge, UK

To test the hypothesis that canopy thinning might result from phosphorus limitations induced by acidic pollutant deposition, paired stands with 'thin' and 'good' canopies were compared by examining (1) the phosphorus nutrition of the trees using a root bioassay and (2) availability of phosphorus in surface soil using a resin-extraction procedure. Three pairs of stands of each of Sitka spruce, Scots pine and beech on a range of comparable soils were investigated. A higher level of phosphorus stress in stands with the thinner canopy compared with their corresponding 'partners' with the better canopy was demonstrated for eight out of the nine pairs; only the pair of beech stands on gley soils did not comply with this finding. A similar pattern was demonstrated with the soil available phosphorus measurements, namely that surface soils had lower amounts of resin-extractable phosphorus under trees with the thinner canopy compared with their respective 'partner' stand with the better canopy; again the beech stands on gley soils did not comply. Analysis of variance indicated that there were significant and complex interactions between tree canopy condition, tree species and soils, in phosphorus stress and surface soil available phosphorus. These results derived from stands distributed over a wide area of northern Britain suggest that there may be a general link between canopy condition and phosphorus stress in trees. However, no link was found between phosphorus stress and estimates of net acidic deposition inputs derived from broad-scale modelling. The critical load for acidic deposition appeared, from these estimates, to be exceeded for all the stands, irrespective of canopy condition. The demonstration of a possible link between tree canopy condition and phosphorus stress suggests that there is a need for a wider investigation, possibly as an integrated art of the UK Tree Health monitoring programme. The hypothesized induction by acidic deposition of phosphorus stress in trees, if true, will require actual monitoring, rather than prediction, of that deposition at each study site.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.