Skip Navigation

Forestry 1999 72(4):313-328; doi:10.1093/forestry/72.4.313
© 1999 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferris, R
Right arrow Articles by Humphrey, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

A review of potential biodiversity indicators for application in British forests

R Ferris and JW HumphreyA1

Forestry Commission Research Agency, Alice Holt Lodge, Wrecclesham, Farnham, Surrey GU10 4LH, UK A1 Forestry Commission Research Agency, Northern Research Station, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9SY, UK

A review of potential indicators of biodiversity in British forests is presented, with a focus on the usefulness of selected biotic parameters as surrogate measures of different aspects of biodiversity in managed forests. To be effective in this respect, indicators must satisfy a number of criteria. They must be readily quantifiable, easily assessed in the field, repeatable and subject to minimal observer bias, cost effective, and ecologically meaningful (i.e. close association with, and identification of, the conditions and responses of other species). It is suggested that a combination of structural (physiognomy of stands and associated structures) and compositional indicators (indicator species or species groups) is selected which is appropriate to the aims of management and to the particular forest type in question. A useful approach is to identify two to three key compositional indicators, shown to be functionally linked to a broad range of other species, such as the extent and species composition of the broadleaved component in conifer forests; and two to three key structural indicators, which act as surrogates for general species richness or diversity, such as the quantity and quality of deadwood.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.