Skip Navigation

Forestry 1999 72(4):293-304; doi:10.1093/forestry/72.4.293
© 1999 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jinks, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kerr, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Establishment and early growth of different plant types of Corsican pine (Pinus nigra var. maritima) on four sites in Thetford Forest

RL Jinks and G Kerr

Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Wrecclesham, Farnham, Surrey GU10 4LH, UK

The field performance of six different plant types of Corsican pine (Pinus nigra var. maritima (Ait.) Melville) was compared over the first 4 years after outplanting at four sites in Thetford Forest, East Anglia. The stock types differed in size, age and method of production and included conventional 1-year-old container seedlings raised in Japanese Paper Pots and Rigipots, 11/2;- and 2-year old seedlings raised in Japanese Paper Pots, as well as 2-year-old bare-root seedlings which either had or had not been undercut.

Survival was high (> 87 per cent) for all types except the non-undercut 2-year-old bare-root seedlings. Height and stem diameter growth were generally low during the first year after planting, but by the end of the second year there were significant differences between individual plant types and sites. Analysis of height increments in the second year suggested that the 11/2;-year-old container seedlings raised in paper pots had recovered from planting check, whereas other stock types had not. However, average increments were not great enough to allow these 11/2;-year-old seedlings to overtake 2-year-old seedlings which were taller at planting. All stock types had apparently recovered from check in the third and fourth years after planting and were tending to grow on the same growth curve at each site with shorter seedlings producing smaller height increments. Thus initial seedling size and site factors, rather than method of production, were the most important factors determining future growth with the height advantage of taller seedlings at planting being maintained or increased in subsequent years.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.