Skip Navigation

Forestry 1997 70(3):253-266; doi:10.1093/forestry/70.3.253
© 1997 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RUEL, J-C.
Right arrow Articles by BENOIT, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The estimation of wind exposure for windthrow hazard rating: comparison between Strongblow, MC2, Topex and a wind tunnel study

J-C. RUEL1, D. PIN1, L. SPACEK2, K. COOPER3 and R. BENOIT4

1 Groupe de Recherches en Aménagement Durable et Intégré des Forêts, Département des Sciences du Bois et de la Forêt Université Laval Sainte-Foy, Québec, G1K 7P4, Canada
2 Département des Sciences de la Terre, Université du Québec à Montréal B.P. 8888, succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec, H3C 3P8, Canada
3 National Research Council Canada, Aerodynamics Laboratory Montreal Road, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0R6, Canada
4 Recherche en Prévision Numérique Environment Canada, 2121 Trans-Canada Highway, Dorval, Quebec, H9P 1J3, Canada

This paper compares five different methods of wind exposure assessment in an attempt to identify a method that could serve in windthrow hazard assessment. The candidate methods that were selected are: a wind tunnel simulation, two numerical models based on air flow behaviour (MC2 and Strongblow) and two empirical methods (Topex and Topex-to-distance). Best correlations with the wind tunnel results were observed with Strongblow and Topex-to-distance. For MC2, significant correlations were obtained at high windspeeds but not at lower windspeeds. Ranking of windiness by topographic position was identical for the wind tunnel, Strongblow and Topex-to-distance. Wind direction estimation by MC2 showed little sensitivity to topography, especially at higher windspeeds. This fact can be attributed both to the version of MC2 used and the conditions in which the simulations were performed. The estimation of windspeed by direction obtained with Strongblow also appeared not to be very reliable. The satisfactory performance of Topex-to-distance and the ease with which this method can be calculated would make it appropriate for inclusion in a windthrow hazard rating system.

Received 18 April 1996.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.