Skip Navigation

Forestry 1997 70(3):233-252; doi:10.1093/forestry/70.3.233
© 1997 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (65)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GARDINER, B. A.
Right arrow Articles by WOOD, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Field and wind tunnel assessments of the implications of respacing and thinning for tree stability

B. A. GARDINER1,*, G. R. STACEY2, R. E. BELCHER2 and C. J. WOOD2

1 Forest Research, Northern Research Station Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9SY, Scotland
2 Department of Engineering Science, Oxford University South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 2PJ, England

* Present address: Englishworks, P. Paaltjensstraat 20, 7552 VM Hengelo (Ov), Netherlands.

The change in wind loading on trees due to tree spacing and wind speed was examined in the field and in the wind tunnel. The field measurements were made in small blocks of Sitka spruce respaced 15 years previously to different stand densities. The wind tunnel measurements were made with dynamically correct 20-cm tall plastic trees. The maximum bending moment on trees showed a linear increase with the ratio of spacing to height. Estimates suggest that at the wider spacing tree diameter has increased sufficiently so that trees are less likely to break. However, the increase in resistance to overturning is not as rapid as the increase in wind loading and wider spaced trees will be more vulnerable to overturning. Wind tunnel measurements were also carried out on a range of commercial thinning practices and showed that the critical factor in reducing stand stability is the size of gap made in the forest. The mechanical and dynamic characteristics of trees at different spacing are presented. These show that with increasing spacing the Young's modulus of trees decreases and their damping coefficient increases. This illustrates that wide spaced trees have weaker wood than close spaced trees but they are less reliant on the support of neighbouring trees. The implications of the measurements on the overall stability of stands and the implications for forest managers are discussed.

Received 8 December 1995.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 ForestryHome page
S. Dupont and Y. Brunet
Impact of forest edge shape on tree stability: a large-eddy simulation study
Forestry, July 1, 2008; 81(3): 299 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ForestryHome page
B. Gardiner, K. Byrne, S. Hale, K. Kamimura, S. J. Mitchell, H. Peltola, and J.-C. Ruel
A review of mechanistic modelling of wind damage risk to forests
Forestry, July 1, 2008; 81(3): 447 - 463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ForestryHome page
M. J. Schelhaas
The wind stability of different silvicultural systems for Douglas-fir in the Netherlands: a model-based approach
Forestry, July 1, 2008; 81(3): 399 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Bot.Home page
H. M. Peltola
Mechanical stability of trees under static loads
Am. J. Botany, October 1, 2006; 93(10): 1501 - 1511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Bot.Home page
K. J. Niklas and H.-C. Spatz
Allometric theory and the mechanical stability of large trees: proof and conjecture
Am. J. Botany, June 1, 2006; 93(6): 824 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ForestryHome page
B. Gardiner, B. Marshall, A. Achim, R. Belcher, and C. Wood
The stability of different silvicultural systems: a wind-tunnel investigation
Forestry, December 1, 2005; 78(5): 471 - 484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.