Skip Navigation

Forestry 1996 69(3):245-261; doi:10.1093/forestry/69.3.245
© 1996 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HODGE, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by HARMER, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Woody colonization on unmanaged urban and ex-industrial sites

S. J. HODGE and R. HARMER

Forestry Authority, Research Station, Alice Holt Lodge Wrecclesham, Farnham, Surrey, GU10 4LH, England

Forty-six unmanaged urban and ex-industrial sites in the county of Avon, South Staffordshire and the West Midlands were visited in 1992/93 during a survey which aimed to relate site factors with natural colonization by trees and shrubs. The factors observed included: type and texture of substrate; the predominant type of vegetation; aspect; the presence of parents in the near vicinity of the site and the numbers and species of colonizing woody plants. The extent of woody colonization was very variable and despite an average stocking density of 1500 stems ha–1, only 19 per cent of the land surveyed was colonized to an acceptable woodland standard. Woodland produced by natural colonization was species poor with an average of three per site; the most abundant species were ash, birch, goat willow and hawthorn, which made up 85 per cent of the colonization recorded. Although there was variation between species, the presence of the parent was usually the most important factor associated with colonization; when potential parent trees were visible from the site there was, on average, a 58 per cent probability of finding colonization of the corresponding species. In general, colonizing plants were positively associated with subsoil, small stony substrates such as gravel and ballast, and a weak grass sward. Conversely colonization was negatively associated with loam soils, sand, unfractured rock/concrete substrates, and sites with grazed sward or no vegetation.


Received 1 March 1995.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.