Skip Navigation

Forestry 1994 67(2):105-118; doi:10.1093/forestry/67.2.105
© 1994 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CATT, D.C.
Right arrow Articles by TYLER, G.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Collisions against Fences by Woodland Grouse in Scotland

D.C. CATT1, D. DUGAN2, R.E. GREEN2, R. MONCRIEFF2, R. MOSS1, N. PICOZZI1, R.W. SUMMERS2 and G.A. TYLER2

1 Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Hill of Brathens, Banchory, Kincardineshire, AB31 4BY, Scotland
2 The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds 17 Regent Terrace, Edinburgh, EH7 5BN, Scotland

A study was carried out in native pinewoods at Abernethy and Glen Tanar to investigate the effect of forest fences on capercaillie and black grouse. Collisions occurred at a rate of 0.25 and 0.03 per km of fence per month for capercaillie and black grouse respectively. Male capercaillie had a higher proportion of severe and fatal collisions than females. Capercaillie tended to collide with those sections of fence where there were moderately sized pines (8.5 m) close (within 4.4 m) to the fence. Collision sites close to trees were most strongly associated with the height of exposed trunk, suggesting that capercaillie fly under the canopy and fail to see the fence. The annual mortality rate of radio-tagged capercaillie caused by collisions was 32 per cent indicating that this was a major mortality factor. Collisions were most frequent between September and November when capercaillie were dispersing. It is recommended that fences are removed where and when they are unnecessary, or are made more visible, or are set back from old woodland.

Received 25 March 1993.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.