Skip Navigation

Forestry 1992 65(1):73-82; doi:10.1093/forestry/65.1.73
© 1992 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MALIMBWI, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by MWIHOMEKE, S. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Effects of Spacing on Yield and some Wood Properties of Cupressus lusitanica at Rongai, Northern Tanzania

R. E. MALIMBWI1, A. PERSSON1, S. IDDI1, S. A. O. CHAMSHAMA1 and S. T. MWIHOMEKE2

1Faculty of Forestry, Sokoine University of Agriculture P. O. Box 3009, Morogoro, Tanzania
2Tanzania Forestry Research Institute P. O. Box 95, Lushoto, Tanzania

A Cupressus lusitanica spacing experiment located at Rongai, Northern Tanzania was assessed at the age of 19 years. The experiment was planted at square spacings of 1.13 m, 1.46 m, 1.88 m, 2.43 m, and 3.14 m. Other than pruning to 1.8–2.0 m at the age of 3 years and routine weeding, the experiment did not receive any other treatment. Assessment was made of survival, branch diameter, height, basal area, volume production, heartwood content, basic density and wood strength. Height, basal area, merchantable volume, basic density, heartwood content, modulus of elasticity, modulus of rupture and compression parallel to grain were not significantly affected by spacing. All other variables were significantly affected. Mortality decreased with increasing spacing while branch diameter and breast height diameter increased. Total volume decreased with increased spacing. The implications of these results on future management of C. lusitanica in Tanzania are discussed.


Received 26 April 1990.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.