Skip Navigation

Forestry 1990 63(2):177-196; doi:10.1093/forestry/63.2.177
© 1990 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HOWARD, P. J. A.
Right arrow Articles by HOWARD, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Titratable Acids and Bases in Tree and Shrub Leaf Litters

P. J. A. HOWARD and D. M. HOWARD

Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Merlewood Research Station Grange-over-Sands, LA11 6JU, England

Acidity of aqueous extracts of several tree and shrub leaf litters was determined by titration to pH 7 with 0.01N NaOH. Bases were determined by back titration of 0.05N HCl extracts of ground litters and after ashing. Lowest acidity was found in the broadleaved species (except sycamore) and western red cedar; greatest acidity was found in western hemlock, grand fir, and one sample of Douglas fir. Largest contents of ash bases were found in some broadleaves plus western red cedar; the smallest contents were in most of the conifers. Excess ash bases (ash bases minus acidity) were greatest in elm, hawthorn, western red cedar, hazel, willow, ash, and southern beech, and were smallest in western hemlock, Douglas fir, lodgepole pile, Sitka spruce, grand fir, hybrid larch, Scots pine, and Norway spruce. Acidity, directly titratable and ash bases, and excess ash bases showed significant, and in some cases quite large, variation between sites for some species. There is some support for the suggestion that excess ash bases are greater in mull-forming than in mor-forming litters. Acidity was significantly greater for litters collected dry than for those collected wet. Litters which were stored air dry for several months showed increased acidity compared with their initial values.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.