Skip Navigation

Forestry 1990 63(1):29-38; doi:10.1093/forestry/63.1.29
© 1990 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McKILLOP, D. G.
Right arrow Articles by HUTCHINSON, R. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Determination of Risk Adjusted Discount Rates for Private Sector Forestry Investment

D. G. McKILLOP and R. W. HUTCHINSON

Department of Banking and Commerce, University of Ulster Coleraine, Co. Londonderry BT52 1SA, Northern Ireland

In forestry economics a great deal of attention has been given to the choice of discount rate when this activity has been constituted as part of the public sector investment portfolio. In contrast, little attention has been paid to the discount rate that should be used when afforestation is considered as part of a portfolio of investments in the private sector. There are major difficulties, both practical and methodological, in determining the discount rate that should be applied to private as opposed to public sector afforestation projects. The central purpose of this paper is thus to derive the appropriate discount rate for private sector forestry with attention focused primarily on risk adjusted discount rates of the type applied in commercial capital budgeting. The relevant risk adjusted rates are then employed to assess the viability of a 28.5 ha private sector afforestation stand based on Oceanic forestry technology. The afforestation project is assessed under the differing tax and grant anangements introduced in 1988, available within the Farm Woodland Scheme and the Woodland Grant Scheme. The analysis finally concludes that the use of a risk adjusted discount rate leads to forestry, under both schemes, being characterized as a profitable venture.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.