Skip Navigation

Forestry 1989 62(1):67-88; doi:10.1093/forestry/62.1.67
© 1989 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RUSHTON, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by TONER, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Wind Damage to the Leaves of Sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) in Coastal and Non-coastal Stands

B. S. RUSHTON and A. E. TONER

Department of Biology, University of Ulster Coleraine, Northern Ireland, BT52 1SA

Wind damage to the leaves of sycamore (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) trees was examined at five sites in Northern Ireland during June and September, 1986 by estimating the percentage of leaf area showing lesions, discoloration or actual loss of lamina surface.

Levels of damage on individual leaves ranged up to 46.6 per cent of the leaf area but few leaves had damage greater than 10 percent. Two sites showed relatively low levels of damage (about 2 per cent of lamina damaged); one site was inland, and the other, although coastal, was well sheltered. The three other sites had damage in excess of 3.5 per cent of the lamina area—the site with the highest levels of damage being the most exposed site and the one probably experiencing the greatest amount of turbulence. Most damage had occurred by June and there was little increase in damage levels between the June and September samples; there was however evidence of the premature loss of the most highly damaged leaves.

Regression analysis indicated that at sites showing the highest levels of damage, the most highly damaged leaves were the smallest. It is argued that in these cases the damage to the leaves is sufficiently high to prevent full leaf expansion. At sites where the overall damage levels were lower, there was either a non-significant relationship between percentage leaf damage and leaf area or a significant positive relationship. It is suggested here that the damage levels are not great enough to inhibit the expanding leaves reaching full size.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.