Skip Navigation

Forestry 1989 62(1):29-39; doi:10.1093/forestry/62.1.29
© 1989 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by REYNOLDS, B.
Right arrow Articles by PATERSON, I. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

A Comparison of Element Fluxes in Throughfall beneath Larch and Sitka Spruce at Two Contrasting Sites in the United Kingdom

B. REYNOLDS1, J. N. CAPE2 and I. S. PATERSON3

1Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Bangor Research Station Penrhos Road, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2LQ Wales
2Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian, EH26 0GB Scotland
3Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Banchory Research Station Hill of Brathens, Glassel, Banchory, Kincardineshire, AB3 4BY Scotland

Annual chemical fluxes for ten elements beneath larch and Sitka spruce are presented for contrasting sites in N.E. Scotland and mid-Wales. The Scottish site is relatively low altitude with moderate rainfall and the Welsh site is relatively high altitude with high rainfall; both sites have low air concentrations of SO2 and NO2 The data show clear differences in throughfall element fluxes between larch and Sitka spruce of similar age and, for the same species, between the two sites. For sea-derived ions and Ca, the trees appear to respond differently to the contrasting climatic and depositional environments at the two sites; this overrides any consistent differences between species for these elements. Species related differences, consistent at both sites, are apparent for H ion, SO4 and the major nutrients. Larch releases more K and P but retains more inorganic N than Sitka spruce. Beneath larch, the H ion flux is approximately three times and the SO4 flux 1.5 times that beneath Sitka spruce, indicating that larch is more acidifying than spruce.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.