Skip Navigation

Forestry 1988 61(4):359-368; doi:10.1093/forestry/61.4.359
© 1988 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MCKILLOP, I. G.
Right arrow Articles by WILSON, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Improved specifications for Rabbit Fencing for Tree Protection

I. GORDON MCKILLOP1, HARRY W. PEPPER2 and CHARLES J. WILSON3

1Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Worplesdon Laboratory, Tangley Place, Guildford, Surrey GU3 3LO
2Forestry Commission, Forest Research Station, Alice Holt Lodge, Wrecclesham, Farnham, Surrey GU10 41H
3Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Staplake Mount, Starcross, Exeter, Devon EX6 8PE

The need to protect young trees from rabbit damage has and will increase as a result of recent policy on broadleaved and farm woodlands. Fencing is a necessary but expensive protection measure.

Trials were conducted to establish specifications for wire netting rabbit fences that were cost-effective. Cost-effectiveness was measured in terms of price per metre and effectiveness as a rabbit barrier. Mesh sizes of 31 mm (hexagonal) 50x25 mm (rectangular) were required to exclude all age classes of rabbit. Fence heights of 0.9 m, the commonly accepted height, and 0.75 m were equally effective, excluding more than 90 per cent of adult rabbits in enclosure trials and about 80 per cent in field trials. The 0.75 m fence cost was 6 per cent less and therefore more cost-effective.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.