Skip Navigation

Forestry 1986 59(1):29-38; doi:10.1093/forestry/59.1.29
© 1986 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ANDERSON, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by PYATT, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Interception of precipitation by pole-stage Sitka spruce and lodgepole pine and mature Sitka spruce at Kielder Forest, Northumberland

A. R. ANDERSON and D. G. PYATT

Forestry Commission, Northern Research Station Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9SY

Interception loss was measured indirectly for 3 years in adjacent unthinned 25-year-old stands of Sitka spruce and lodgepole pine and for 2 years in a 63-year-old selectively thinned stand of Sitka spruce. For each stand measurements were made of gross precipitation, throughfall and stemflow. Interception loss was derived by subtracting the sum of throughfall and stemflow (net precipitation) from gross precipitation.

For the years 1977–78, 1978–79 and 1979–80, interception losses in the pole-stage Sitka spruce were 32, 28 and 27 per cent of gross precipitation respectively while those in the lodgepole pine were 33, 29 and 26 per cent. For 1979–80 and 1980–81 interception losses in the mature Sitka spruce were 44 and 53 per cent of gross precipitation. The average interception loss was 29 per cent for both pole-stage crops and 49 per cent for mature Sitka spruce.

The proportions of net precipitation reaching the ground as stemflow and throughfall were 0.18 and 0.82 respectively for the pole-stage Sitka spruce, 0.14 and 0.86 for the pole-stage lodepole pine and 0.02 and 0.98 for the mature Sitka spruce.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.