Skip Navigation

Forestry 1983 56(1):33-43; doi:10.1093/forestry/56.1.33
© 1983 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DIGHTON, J.
Right arrow Articles by HARRISON, A. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Phosphorus Nutrition of Lodgepole Pine and Sitka Spruce Stands as indicated by a Root Bioassay

J. DIGHTON and A. F. HARRISON

Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Merlewood Research Station Grangeover-Sands, Cumbria

A bioassay for determining P-deficiency, based on the rate of uptake of 32P-labelled phosphorus by roots from a standard solution and developed on pot grown tree seedlings, has been applied to roots from 10–18 year old lodgepole pine and Sitka spruce stands in field fertilizer trials on peat. Rates of 32-phosphorus uptake by roots were negatively related to quantities of P fertilizer previously given and to tree heights. The P content of first whorl needle samples were generally high but were not significantly different between fertilizer treatments nor related to tree heights.

There was, however, a general relationship between rates of 32P uptake by roots and P content of needles over all sites and tree species. The bioassy, however, rapidly detects changes in internal P status of the tree which takes time to manifest itself in a change of needle P content.

Preliminary work suggests that the bioassay detects a P-status in trees, not identifiable from needle analyses. A number of factors which might influence the results of the bioassay and therefore the field applicability of the method are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.