Skip Navigation

Forestry 1979 52(2):129-150; doi:10.1093/forestry/52.2.129
© 1979 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MOSS, D.
Right arrow Articles by EASTERBEE, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

The Effects on Song-Bird Populations of Upland Afforestation with Spruce

D. MOSS *, P.N. TAYLOR {dagger} and N. EASTERBEE {dagger}

Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Edinburgh The Kings Buildings, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JU.

  1. Large coniferous plantations have been established widely in uplands previously used for rearing sheep and cattle, causing fundamental changes in the wild life of these areas.
  2. Breeding song-birds were censused in south-west Scotland on upland moorland grazed by sheep and in spruce plantations at different stages of growth.
  3. The commonest song-bird species were meadow pipit and skylark on unplanted areas, meadow pipit in establishment plantation, willow warbler and wren in thicket, and goldcrest, chaffinch and wren in polestage and thinned plantations.
  4. Total song-bird densities were 40–70 pairs km–2 on unplanted heather, 70–130 pairs km–2 on unplanted grass, 125–200 pairs km–2 on 6 year old trees, 230–290 pairs km–2 on 12–14 year old trees, and 300–440 pairs km–2 on trees over 20 years old. Bird species diversity was also greatest in trees over 20 years old, with one exception.
  5. Many bird species depend on unafforested moorland, but were not censused since they are too sparsely distributed. Their loss is to be set against the gain in numbers of smaller song birds following afforestation which was inferred from the study plots. From the standpoint of bird conservation, diverse forest structure and the retention of some large unafforested upland areas is advocated.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.