Skip Navigation

Forestry 1978 51(2):151-161; doi:10.1093/forestry/51.2.151
© 1978 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HELLIWELL, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Floristic Diversity in Some Central Swedish Forests

D. R. HELLIWELL1

Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Merlewood Research Station Grangeover-Sands, Cumbria, UK.

1Current address: Waterloo Mill, Wotton-under-Edge, Glos.

The species of vascular plants present in 0·5 ha sample plots were recorded in 19 areas of forest planted on former agricultural land, 21 areas of old or ‘virgin’ forest and 102 areas of ‘ordinary forest’ in east central Sweden. In the case of the planted forest areas, the main correlation with floristic diversity was with the amount of daylight reaching the forest floor. In the ‘old forest’ and ‘ordinary forest’ sites, however, the main correlations were with the pH value of the surface soil, the amount which this varied within the sample plot, and the proportion of broadleaved trees in the tree canopy; these factors were inter-correlated with each other to some extent. The ‘old forest’ sites, which had the most acidic surface soil and least diverse flora, did not appear to be serving any particularly useful function in terms of conservation of the flora, at the present time. It is concluded that, if a diverse forest flora is required for any particular reason, the complete closure of the canopy should be avoided. A mixture containing some broadleaved trees is likely to be preferable to a pure crop of pine or spruce. There appears to be, however, considerable scope for the development of a diverse flora within timber-producing forests consisting mainly of spruce and pine.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.