Skip Navigation

Forestry 1968 41(1):59-71; doi:10.1093/forestry/41.1.59
© 1968 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RODEN, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Woodland and its Management in the Medieval Chilterns

DAVID RODEN

Geography Department, the University Khartoum

Studies of medieval woodland are few and mostly concern the royal forests. This account of the Chiltern woods thus goes some way towards filling a significant gap.

Assarting had ended in the Chilterns by 1300, leaving a pattern of woodland that remained basically unchanged for 300 years. Most woods comprised high forest and underwood. Beech was the dominant species, but many woods also contained much oak and ash, especially in the north-east. Private and common woodlands had become distinctive, often after complex transactions.

Private woods were especially valued for fuel, sold in the vale and London—n important factor in their preservation. There was no systematic management in the extensive woods of the south-western and central Chilterns, although selective felling was sometimes practised by the late fifteenth century. In the north-east, where timber was limited, coppicing was widely followed by 1400. Common woods, generally more open in character, provided timber, pannage, and herbage for villagers in hill and vale, but common rights were often restricted.

The sixteenth century brought renewed clearing for cultivation and expanding timber sales. Beech, now usually coppice, became ever more prominent, eventually to be converted to high forest with the rise of the furniture industry after 1800.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ForestryHome page
E. P. Mountford, P. S. Savill, and D. P. Bebber
Patterns of regeneration and ground vegetation associated with canopy gaps in a managed beechwood in southern England
Forestry, October 1, 2006; 79(4): 389 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.