Skip Navigation

Forestry 1951 24(1):6-18;
© 1951 by Institute of Chartered Foresters
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BOURNE, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

A FALLACY IN THE THEORY OF GROWING STOCK

R. BOURNE 1

It is generally accepted that the theories of growing stock of von Mantel, Oettelt, and Pressler which in themselves are not strictly applicable to yield management of even-aged normal forest are equally applicable to uneven-aged selection forest and irregular forestry. Attention is drawn to the marked differences demonstrated in Switzerland between selection and uniform growing stocks. Figures for British beechwoods are given which also demonstrate this difference. It is fallacious therefore to apply methods of yield regulation for uniform forests to selection or irregular areas. There is a far greater volume of timber per acre in normal selection forest than in normal uniform forest. The physiological reasons are outlined and the evolution of irregular silviculture from unsatisfactory uniform methods on the Continent is discussed. Mixed woods of several species in harmony with local ecology are considered most suitable components of irregular stands, sharing air, light, and soil more efficiently and providing more suitable regeneration conditions. Figures from successive enumerations in Chiltern beechwoods are given to show development from uniform to irregular stocking, and the economic as well as volumetric advantages are demonstrated.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.